<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What 5 Percent Coverage Page Looks Like</title>
	<link>http://blog.tonercartridgedepot.com/2008/01/17/what-5-percent-coverage-page-looks-like/</link>
	<description>Get to know printer industry news, articles and announces at Toner Cartridge Depot Official Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  1 Dec 2008 20:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Sense</title>
		<link>http://blog.tonercartridgedepot.com/2008/01/17/what-5-percent-coverage-page-looks-like/#comment-9749</link>
		<author>Sense</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.tonercartridgedepot.com/2008/01/17/what-5-percent-coverage-page-looks-like/#comment-9749</guid>
		<description>Lord Printman, above me, said:

"The reason why 5% is used as a standard is so that it is easily comparable and easy to calculate on the spot."

And by your own admission, a full page of text is really around 12% coverage. 

If the whole reason for using 5% is make calculations easier, then why the hell haven't they used an almost full page, say hmmm, 10% (wow, what a nice number to deal with).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lord Printman, above me, said:</p>
<p>&#8220;The reason why 5% is used as a standard is so that it is easily comparable and easy to calculate on the spot.&#8221;</p>
<p>And by your own admission, a full page of text is really around 12% coverage. </p>
<p>If the whole reason for using 5% is make calculations easier, then why the hell haven&#8217;t they used an almost full page, say hmmm, 10% (wow, what a nice number to deal with).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://blog.tonercartridgedepot.com/2008/01/17/what-5-percent-coverage-page-looks-like/#comment-8304</link>
		<author>Greg</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.tonercartridgedepot.com/2008/01/17/what-5-percent-coverage-page-looks-like/#comment-8304</guid>
		<description>I would expect 5% coverage to mean that 5% of the paper is covered with ink or toner. It looks like it is closer to being 1% of the paper covered when they claim 5% coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would expect 5% coverage to mean that 5% of the paper is covered with ink or toner. It looks like it is closer to being 1% of the paper covered when they claim 5% coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Printman</title>
		<link>http://blog.tonercartridgedepot.com/2008/01/17/what-5-percent-coverage-page-looks-like/#comment-7245</link>
		<author>Lord Printman</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.tonercartridgedepot.com/2008/01/17/what-5-percent-coverage-page-looks-like/#comment-7245</guid>
		<description>That is NOT what 5% looks like. That is much more like 2%, which means the "full page" of text yields to be approximately 12% coverage. The reason why 5% is used as a standard is so that it is easily comparable and easy to calculate on the spot.

It may be misleading to people who do not know anything about printers/printing, but it can be easily researched from the 
product's webpages. 

At say, 5000 pages at 5% coverage, and you know you're going to bringing primarily printing pages wtih about 12% coverage, you can easily do the maths in your head (12/5=2.4, thus 5000-&#62;~2000 pages). Whereas, if they were to calculate the "more standard" page size, you'd have numbers at like 1300 at 30% coverage, and in my opinion calculating for 12% is slightly more of a challenge for most people to do on the spot while browsing for printers in a store. 

An improvement would be to list different coverage percentages and corresponding uses for those percentages. Eg full page text xxxx 12% w/ standard font, xxxx lecture slides with pictures 30%, xxxx full page picture 80%, etc.

Just be sure to do your research so that you understand the information provided by the manufacturers and you'll have no trouble choosing a printer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is NOT what 5% looks like. That is much more like 2%, which means the &#8220;full page&#8221; of text yields to be approximately 12% coverage. The reason why 5% is used as a standard is so that it is easily comparable and easy to calculate on the spot.</p>
<p>It may be misleading to people who do not know anything about printers/printing, but it can be easily researched from the<br />
product&#8217;s webpages. </p>
<p>At say, 5000 pages at 5% coverage, and you know you&#8217;re going to bringing primarily printing pages wtih about 12% coverage, you can easily do the maths in your head (12/5=2.4, thus 5000-&gt;~2000 pages). Whereas, if they were to calculate the &#8220;more standard&#8221; page size, you&#8217;d have numbers at like 1300 at 30% coverage, and in my opinion calculating for 12% is slightly more of a challenge for most people to do on the spot while browsing for printers in a store. </p>
<p>An improvement would be to list different coverage percentages and corresponding uses for those percentages. Eg full page text xxxx 12% w/ standard font, xxxx lecture slides with pictures 30%, xxxx full page picture 80%, etc.</p>
<p>Just be sure to do your research so that you understand the information provided by the manufacturers and you&#8217;ll have no trouble choosing a printer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young Kim</title>
		<link>http://blog.tonercartridgedepot.com/2008/01/17/what-5-percent-coverage-page-looks-like/#comment-570</link>
		<author>Young Kim</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.tonercartridgedepot.com/2008/01/17/what-5-percent-coverage-page-looks-like/#comment-570</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the information here.
I was shopping for laser toner and they kept saying 5% xxxx pages, and I had no clue what that 5% meant and I automatically assumed it to be sort of inferior because it was a LOW number.

Well, I guess if it's measured as 5%, it's a little  disadvantage for users and sellers are over-representing their products because we rarely fill up the pages just 5%, for me it's more like 10-15%.

Anyways Thank you so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the information here.<br />
I was shopping for laser toner and they kept saying 5% xxxx pages, and I had no clue what that 5% meant and I automatically assumed it to be sort of inferior because it was a LOW number.</p>
<p>Well, I guess if it&#8217;s measured as 5%, it&#8217;s a little  disadvantage for users and sellers are over-representing their products because we rarely fill up the pages just 5%, for me it&#8217;s more like 10-15%.</p>
<p>Anyways Thank you so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
